The Death of a Fig Tree

5 June 2014 by Rev Dr Steven Kau-

Over the years, I have always been puzzled as to why the Lord cursed the fig tree when the Scriptures clearly informed us that it was not the season for bearing fruits. I was taken aback by the “strangeness” of the events that occurred and thought the Lord was unreasonable to curse a tree when it was not the time for bearing fruits. Was the Lord upset or angry about something and took it out on an “innocent” fig tree? 

 

 

Mark account records the story as follows: 

“Now the next day, when they had come out from Bethany, he was hungry. And seeing from afar a fig tree having leaves, he went to see if perhaps He could find something on it. When he came to it, He found nothing but leaves, for it was not the season for figs. In response Jesus said to it, “Let no one eat fruit from you ever again.” And His disciples heard it……Now in the morning, as they pass by, they saw the fig tree dried up from the roots. And Peter, remembering, said to Him, “Rabbi, look! The fig tree which you cursed has withered away.”
(Mark 11:12-14, 20-21) 

 

One prominent question naturally arises from a straightforward reading of the text. Why would Jesus curse a fig tree that did not have figs on it, especially since the text says that “it was not the season for figs?” In response to this puzzling question, skeptical minds have let themselves run wild with accusations regarding the passage. Steve Wells, the author of ‘The Skeptic’ Annotated Bible’ labeled this story as an absurdity and said in a sarcastic tone: “Jesus kills a fig tree for not bearing figs, even though it was out of season. He did this to show the world just how much God hates figs.” Louis Cable, another skeptic responded to the story with this statement: “Now to curse a fig tree for not bearing fruit in March is not unlike kicking a dog because it cannot speak English thereby punishing it for the inability to do the impossible.” 

Is it the case that Jesus capriciously, out of anger, cursed the fig tree for not bearing fruit, even though the tree was incapable of producing? With a little research, one quickly ascertains that such is not the case. Not only does an excellent reason exist for the curse upon the fig tree but an equally good spiritual application should be considered as well. When Jesus approached the fig tree, the text indicates that the tree had plenty of leaves. 

 

 

R.K. Harrison, writing in the International Standard Bible Encyclopedia, explains that various kinds of figs grew in Palestine during the first century. One very important aspect of fig growth has to do with the relationship between the leaf and the fruit. Harrison notes that the tiny figs known to the Arabs as ‘taksh,’ “appears simultaneously in the leaf axils” (1982, 2:302). This ‘taksh’ is edible and “is often gathered for sale in the markets”. 

Furthermore, the text notes: “When the young leaves are appearing in spring, every fertile fig will have some ‘taksh’ on it…….But if a tree with leaves has no fruit, it will be barren for the entire season.” (2:301-302) Thus, when Jesus approached the leafy fig tree, He had every reason to suspect that something edible would be on it. However, after inspecting the tree, Mark records that “He found nothing but leaves.” No ‘taksh’ were budding as they should have been if the tree was going to produce edible figs that year. The tree appeared to be fruitful but it had only outward signs of bearing fruit (leaves) and in truth offered nothing of value to two weary travelers. 

In addition, anyone even slightly familiar with the character of Jesus knows that He did not spend His time on this earth eradicating barren fig trees as an ecological service to Palestinians farmers. What then, was the point of such abrupt action against the tree? 

 

 

When one notices the context of the event, Jesus’ intention seems to become apparent and two fold. First, in its immediate context, the barren fig tree seems to apply to the pretentious religion of the Jewish leaders in Jerusalem. Following Jesus’ curse upon the fig tree, the text says that Jesus went to Jerusalem and began to drive the money changers out of the temple. (Mark 11:15-19) The activities in the temple that once had been fruitful and wholesome had become empty of value and useless. Allen Black commented: “The cursing of the fig tree symbolizes God’s judgment on Israel for not bearing the fruit He wanted from the temple. It foreshadows the cleansing of the temple and ultimately the prophecy of its destruction in chapter 13.” 

Second, in a general sense, Jesus often insisted that trees which do not bear good fruits will be cut down. (Matthew 7:19; Luke 13:6-9) The fig tree did not bear fruit, was useless and deserved to be destroyed; the spiritual application being that any human who does not bear fruit for God will also be destroyed for his or her failure to produce. 

Jesus did not throw a temper tantrum and curse the fig tree even though it was incapable of producing fruit. He cursed the tree because it should have been growing fruit since it had the outward signs of productivity. Jesus’ calculated timing underscore the spiritual truth that barren spiritual trees eventually run out of time. As for personal application, we should all diligently strive to ensure that we are not the barren fig tree.

|Share the good news|